Blind Trusts in Nigeria: Key Structuring Considerations
Reflecting on a recent client engagement involving the structuring of blind trusts, we observed a common misconception that blind trust vehicles are primarily tools for illicit transactions. In reality, when properly implemented, a blind trust is a sophisticated instrument of transparency and compliance. This article highlights the productive and legitimate utility of blind trusts, from mitigating conflicts of interest for public officials to serving as a critical regulatory safeguard in complex M&A transactions.
What is a Blind Trust?
A blind trust is a type of legal trust in which the person who creates the trust (the settlor) gives control of their assets to an independent trustee, and crucially has no knowledge or control over how those assets are being managed once the trust is set up. In other words, the settlor “blinds” themselves to what is happening inside the trust.
2. How is a Blind Trust Structured?
In a blind trust, the settlor transfers assets (shares, businesses, investments, etc.) into a trust. An independent trustee manages those assets. The settlor does not receive information about specific investments or transactions. The trustee has broad discretion to buy, sell, and manage assets.
The key structuring consideration in a blind trust is information restriction, where the settlor is intentionally kept in the dark.
3. Transaction Structures
Blind trusts are mainly used to prevent conflicts of interest or the appearance of them. We consider some of the more common use cases below.
(a) Politicians and public officials
A government official may place assets in a blind trust so they cannot influence decisions that could benefit their investments. For example, a minister owns shares in telecom companies. By placing them in a blind trust, they no longer know whether they are buying/selling those shares. This helps avoid accusations that policy decisions are influenced by personal gain.
(b) High-net-worth individuals
Business owners or executives use blind trusts when. This would be the case where for instance a business man is entering a sensitive role and wanting to avoid insider knowledge issues or qualifying for that role.
(c) Corporate governance / Mergers & Acquisition
In merger and acquisition transactions, blind trusts are used as a regulatory safeguard to manage control and prevent conflicts of interest during the period between signing and final regulatory approval.
A common challenge in M&A transactions is that once parties agree to a transaction, there is often a delay before completion due to competition, antitrust, or sector-specific approvals. During this interim period, regulators are concerned about the possibility that the acquiring party may begin to exercise influence over the target company before the transaction is formally cleared. This is often referred to as “gun-jumping.” To address this risk, regulators or parties may require that the shares or control rights of the target company be placed into a blind trust.
Key Takeaway
Far from being a tool for illicit activity, a blind trust can be a sophisticated legal tool designed to eliminate conflicts of interest by severing the link between an asset owner and the management of those assets. Beyond individual and asset management uses, blind trusts can also serve as a critical regulatory tool in M&A transactions, preventing "gun-jumping" by holding assets in a neutral state until antitrust or competition approvals are finalized.
This material is not legal advice. If you are looking to structure a blind trust, please reach out to your usual Balogun Harold contact or via support@balogunharold.com

Olu A.
LL.B. (UNILAG), B.L. (Nigeria), LL.M. (UNILAG), LL.M. (Reading, U.K.)
Olu is a Partner in the Firm’s Transactions & Policy Practice. Admitted as a Barrister & Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Nigeria in 2009, he has spent over a decade advising clients on high-value transactions and policy matters at some of Nigeria’s leading law firms.
olu@balogunharold.comRelated Articles
Payment Transaction Data Localisation in Nigeria: New CBN Rules and Their Legal Implications
While the CBN payment transaction data directive appears straightforward, its legal implications depend on how its key requirements are interpreted and operationalised in practice.
Data Reuse in Bank Financial HoldCos: CBN Ring-Fencing Considerations
As a commercial matter, treating customer data as a group-wide asset to enable backend database pooling, shared cloud infrastructure, and unified “super-app” ecosystems offers undeniable operational efficiency. However, the new regulations on ring-fencing propose that such cross-company sharing must strictly satisfy specific data protection requirements regarding data reuse and data segregation.
Standby Letters of Credit and the Limits of the Autonomy Principle: Lessons from Celestial Aviation v UniCredit
The Supreme Court’s decision in Celestial Aviation demonstrates that this autonomy is not absolute. In certain circumstances, public law considerations, particularly sanctions legislation, may prevent a bank from honouring an otherwise valid demand under a Standby Letter of Credit.
The PenCom-Dangote IPO Forbearance: Key Considerations for Pension Fund Managers & Employee Retirement Savings
Against this backdrop, the invocation of DIL’s historical track record as a proxy for investment safety raises questions of regulatory logic. Public institutions such as PenCom are under a continuing duty to exercise discretion in a manner that is rational, evidence-based, and capable of withstanding judicial scrutiny.