Proposed New Rules on the Issuance and Allotment of Private Companies: Some Legal Considerations

Proposed New Rules on the Issuance and Allotment of Private Companies: Some Legal Considerations

The Securities & Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) is seeking to regulate debt issuances by private companies and has recently published a draft of the new rules (the “Draft”) for comments. The Draft is the legal framework under which private companies can raise capital publicly without converting to a public company[1]. The Draft requires private companies to register their existing and new debt securities with the SEC, if the debt securities are fixed income securities, “including bonds, debentures and alternative asset classes such as sukuk” and if such debt securities are issued using the private placement route or through a public offer. If the Draft becomes effective, private companies will also be required to file quarterly reports on quarterly utilisation of the funds raised and submit quarterly unaudited financial statements and annual audited financial statements to the SEC. Additionally, private companies can only raise a maximum of N15billion within a 1-year period, must have operated for 3 years and can only sell such securities to qualified investors[2].

Implications for the Private Companies

The Draft will bring private companies within the regulatory remit of the SEC because the Draft essentially establishes a statutory right of action which empowers the SEC to take regulatory action against erring private companies. Where found in breach, private companies can become the subject of an SEC investigation, a regulatory fine or litigation by SEC.

Additionally, private companies looking to issue debt securities will have to carefully think about the implications of disclosing their financial information publicly, during registration with the SEC and on a quarterly basis as required in the Draft.  Private companies also need to think about the increased market and media scrutiny, the compliance and offering costs as well as competitive pressures that may result from a public disclosure of otherwise sensitive financial information.

Is the SEC Overstepping its Legislative Authority by seeking to directly regulate the Private Placement of Debt Securities?

The SEC cites section 43(1)(b) of the extant Business Facilitation Act as the legal basis for its decision to mandate the registration of the debt securities of private companies. Section 43(1)(a) &(b) provides as follows:

“(1) No allotment shall be made of any securities of a company offered to the public for subscription unless in the case of  a:

(a) public company, the amount stated in the prospectus, as the minimum amount, which, in the opinion of the directors, is required to be raised by the issue of share capital in order to provide for the matters specified in paragraph 2 of the Third Schedule to this Act, has been subscribed and the sum payable on application for the amount so stated has been paid to and received by the company ;

(b) private company, through any lawful means, as the Commission may by regulation prescribe”

In contrast to the mandate outlined in section 2(a) of the Draft[3], section 43 does not grant the SEC authority to oversee the private placement of debt securities issued by private companies. Rather, section 43 seems to confine the SEC’s jurisdiction to regulating the public offering of securities by such private entities, while granting the SEC the discretion to establish lawful methods for private companies to make their securities available to the public. This distinction is important especially in view of section 4 of the Draft which requires private companies to register existing/privately-issued debt securities issued prior[4] to the effective date of the Draft. Within this context, the legality of the section 4 is questionable and warrants a review.

It is useful to note that section does not amend section 54 of the ISA which mandates the compulsory registration of the securities of public companies and collective investment schemes. This raises the question as to whether the SEC may by subsidiary legislation mandate the registration of the debt securities issued by private companies.

Final Comments

Given the pivotal role of the provisions of the Draft in shaping the capital market, it may be prudent for the SEC to provide some justification and rationale (not just the legal basis in section 43) for its decision to (x) allow private companies issue debt securities publicly  (y) register the debt securities of private companies, notwithstanding that the potential buyers of the securities will be sophisticated investors; (z) mandate the registration of privately-issued debt securities in view of the legitimate expectation already created by the existing private placement regime under which those securities were issued.

For the SEC, it helps to bear in mind that, in the realm of administrative law, irrationality, illegality, improper purpose & irrelevant considerations, legitimate expectation are all substantive legal grounds upon which an administrative decision or policy can be legitimately challenged. Thus, without further review and clarification from the SEC, section 4 may be the subject of avoidable litigation.

Related Services

  • Securities & Investment Litigation
  • Merger Notifications
  • Mergers & Acquisitions Transactions (Strategic, Private Equity & Venture Capital)
  • Legal Due Diligence & Red Flag Reports
  • Shareholder & Investment Litigation
  • Legal Opinions and Second Opinions
  • Data Privacy Compliance Audits
  • Market Entry & Foreign Direct / Portfolio Investments
  • Technology Investments and Start-ups

[1] A previous Section 67 of the extant Investments & Securities Act (“ISA”) permits only public companies to raise capital from the public. However, section 43 (1)(b) of the Business Facilitation Act has replaced Section 67 of the ISA and now empowers the SEC to specify rules under which private companies can issue securities publicly. Also, section 22(5) of the Companies & Allied Matters Act prohibits private companies from inviting the public to subscribe to its securities except authorised by law. For all intents and purposes, it is to be assumed that the Business Facilitation Act is the controlling provision which legitimises the public issue of “private securities.

[2] It is instructive to note that the Draft does not stipulate the minimum share capital requirement or minimum number or type of shareholders/directors which a private company issuing debt securities must have, suggesting that a private company with any number of shareholders or directors and any amount share capital may now issue debt securities publicly.

[3] In section 2(a), the SEC declares its intention to regulate debt securities issued by way of private placement

[4] Subject to clarification from the SEC, such previously issued debt securities may include debt securities issued via the FMDQ Private Markets by way of private placement

Authors

Related Posts
This website uses cookies and asks your personal data to enhance your browsing experience. We are committed to protecting your privacy and ensuring your data is handled in compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).